Get Ahead with Submittals: How to Win Trust and Save Time

In the design and construction industry, timing and accuracy are everything. For audiovisual (AV) integrators, the construction submittal process is one of the most overlooked opportunities to build trust with architects, engineers, and contractors (AEC).
Submittals—documents that confirm AV systems and materials align with project requirements—are critical to delivering a successful job. But too often, AV submittals are submitted late, incomplete, or out of sync with the construction documentation. When this happens, the team loses valuable time reviewing, revising, or waiting for clarification. Worse, late or inaccurate submittals can lead to installation delays, change orders, and loss of confidence in the AV provider’s ability to execute.
The Solution: Proactively Communicate Progress
To stand out as a proactive and reliable partner, AV integrators must treat submittals as a strategic opportunity—not a back-office burden. Here’s how to get ahead with submittals and demonstrate your value to the project team:
- Understand the Requirements Early
- Review the construction documents and Division 27 (Communications) or 11 (Specialty AV Systems) specifications as early as possible.
- Coordinate with the general contractor or construction manager to confirm deadlines, formats, and review protocols.
- Prepare Submittals with Precision
- Include manufacturer data sheets, system diagrams, equipment lists, and rack elevations showing how each component meets the project’s specifications.
- Label submittals consistently with the CSI MasterFormat and ensure everything ties back to the construction documents.
- Use Visual Aids and Models
- Incorporate BIM-ready files, annotated drawings, or coordination models to communicate the AV scope visually.
- When appropriate, provide renderings or layout plans that help the architect understand the spatial impact of your systems.
- Communicate Proactively
- Notify the design and construction teams when submittals are ready.
- Be prepared to answer questions or revise quickly based on reviewer comments.
- Show a collaborative attitude: you're there to help the entire project succeed.
- Track and Manage the Process
- Use a project management tool or shared submittal log to track review status, comments, and resubmissions.
- Keep your team and the GC informed of any issues that could affect schedule or materials procurement.
The Result: Building Trust and Value
When AV integrators treat submittals as a strategic tool, the benefits are clear:
- Faster Approvals: Clear, organized, and compliant submittals move through the review process more quickly, keeping projects on schedule.
- Increased Trust: Architects and contractors recognize you as a detail-oriented, professional partner who understands construction workflows.
- Fewer Delays and Change Orders: Accurate documentation reduces back-and-forth, avoids scope misunderstandings, and minimizes costly changes.
- Enhanced Reputation: Your firm will become the go-to AV partner for future work thanks to your excellence in supporting design and construction teams.
For example, an AV firm working on a government facility submitted a complete package—including product data, cable schedules, and BIM coordination views—two weeks ahead of schedule. The design team approved the submittals with minor comments, the installation stayed on track, and the GC brought the firm into three subsequent projects.
Closing Thoughts
Every document tells a story in construction; your submittals are no exception. By treating them as a strategic opportunity to demonstrate your professionalism and precision, you will improve project outcomes and build lasting relationships with AEC teams.
Get ahead with submittals, and you'll move from contractor to trusted collaborator.
Recommended Content
Help the AVIXA Foundation

Please sign in
If you are a registered user on AVIXA Xchange, please sign in
Trust and reputation go a long way, normally when working with AV Integrators as a Tech Manager at my firm, I find that they overpromise but then add unexpected costs which frustrates senior management.